Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-05-09 House Journal Page 3981 HB 326 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 3777) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 326(JUD) am "An Act relating to the definition of the crime of harassment." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 326(JUD) "An Act relating to the definition of the crime of harassment; and providing for an effective date." (technical title change) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 326(JUD) am, thus adopting SCS CSHB 326(JUD), and recommended that the members vote yes. 2006-05-09 House Journal Page 3982 The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 326(JUD) am?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 326(JUD) Concur YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Excused: Olson Absent: Anderson, Joule And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 326(JUD). Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 326(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.